Welcome to Answer-ME-Ghana, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.

870k questions

440 answers


783k users

0 votes

What's it about women and energy and . . . shoes?

When Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D- ­Calif.) gave a trendy file-setting eight-hour speech on the Home floor on Wednesday, the truth that she was wearing 4-inch stilettos acquired almost as a lot attention because the immigration situation that had prompted her to take the ground.

Social media was mesmerized. And on MSNBC, Rachel Maddow constructed her personal version of the footwear, taping a sneaker to a ruler, cheap Ferragamo Belts and marveled: "I don’t know if I might do it for eight minutes, not to mention eight hours."

Then came the backlash. "I think Nancy Pelosi is a warrior. But I HATE that even other women are making her damned sneakers the hook," a reader named Kelly Wooden wrote on Twitter, in response to my own column leading with a reference to Pelosi’s gunmetal-blue pumps.

The very fact is, for women in politics, footwear is a metaphor — one feminists themselves have embraced.

Sneakers on a strong woman do more than just get her from one place to a different. They'll declare her feminine id and her willpower to energy via to victory on an uneven taking part in discipline.

They can awe.

In 1988, then-Texas treasurer Ann Richards created a feminist rallying cry when she recycled an old joke throughout her keynote deal with to the Democratic Nationwide Convention: "Ginger Rogers did every thing that Fred Astaire did. She just did it backwards and in high heels."

Then again, why should she must?

For much of the 1990s, girls in Washington preferred to have their ft blend in. One staple right here was the ferragamo belt outlet (describes it) Vara pump, whose low heel, rounded toe and grosgrain-ribbon bow spoke of practicality and disposable earnings.

These shoes were on the outer limit of my very own value range, however I bought two pairs anyway. At some point, then-Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.) noticed them as she passed me in a Capitol hallway. In my reminiscence, she was wearing them, too.

"You know what Madeleine Albright calls those shoes?" she told me. "Post-menopausal mary janes."

Out of the blue, my expensive pumps with their perky little bows felt like a surrender.

There are times when shoes can announce that a woman has taken charge.

In 2005, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice arrived on the Army airfield in Wiesbaden, Germany, in a army-style coat and black leather-based knee-excessive boots with needle-skinny heels. "Rice looked as if she was ready to speak tough, knock heads and do a freeze-frame ‘Matrix’ soar kick if obligatory," Put up trend critic Robin Givhan wrote, noting that there was a "sexual frisson" to the entire impact.

At the opposite end of the assertion-shoe spectrum were the rouge-pink Mizuno Wave Rider trainers that acquired Texas state Sen. Wendy Davis (D) by way of an 11-hour filibuster in opposition to an antiabortion bill in 2013. The sneakers grew to become a bestseller.

All of this is not only an American phenomenon. Britain is obsessive about what covers the toes of Prime Minister Theresa Could, who has a seemingly bottomless assortment of leopard-print pumps and addressed her first summit of European leaders sporting flats that were lined in a print of lipstick kisses.

"It is attention-grabbing that individuals concentrate on my footwear — I don’t assume they give attention to Philip Hammond’s or Boris Johnson’s in quite the same way," May told "Good Morning Britain," referring to 2 of the country’s leading male politicians. "But look, do I remorse the fact that folks have a look at my footwear? Hey, it gives me an excuse to go and buy new shoes."

Partisanship clearly affects how we choose what constitutes a shoe pas, imposing a sort of stiletto double-standard.

The place Pelosi was celebrated for carrying impractical excessive heels, first lady Melania Trump was mocked as "disaster Barbie" for wearing them when she boarded Air Pressure One to see the devastation caused by Hurricane Harvey. (By the time she acquired off the plane, she was in white sneakers.) However the shoe was on the other foot in 2009, when Michelle Obama was lambasted by the proper for sporting $540 Lanvin cap-toe suede sneakers to a meals bank.

Granted, these are criticisms that no one would ever make about a man, and there are plenty of issues to hate a few fashion industry that imposes ache as the value of stylishness.

Typically, a shoe is just a shoe. And sometimes, there's something inspirational in including an extra degree of difficulty to standing one’s floor and never going wobbly.

So it’s okay to take observe — and even to cheer — when a girl chooses to not do issues the easy manner.

Still, my own closet is lined with low heels and rubber soles. The colours I buy go all the way from black to darkish brown.

Because, let’s be serious. I’ve got to walk in these things.

asked by (340 points)

Please log in or register to answer this question.